Show newer

FDA admits that neither VAERS nor its many other pharmacovigilance systems are functional, nor will VAERS be in the future anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/20

Φ At this point we have not found anything that grants the full approval the media is portraying. The links we have found from the media and from searching lead one to believe the links posted above show that none of them confirm the claims of the lying media. The media is most likely lying and misconstruing government double speak/ambiguity.

● The EUA gives the right to refuse, and requires that no alternative treatments are available. The EUA appears to me to be the weak point to the lies, assuming they are lies.

╬ The original EUA was illegal also since Ivermectin & HCQ + Zinc were available before the EUA was issued. Thus, an approval based-upon an illegal EUA which can also be challenged would collapse under legal scrutiny.

۞ And also if the EUA gives the right to refuse, how in the hell are universities, government agencies, companies mandating the shots for their employees and nobody has been able to win a legal case to expose all of this and end all of this charade now, tell the people the full truth? Why is everyone so ignorant as to what is going-on and not speaking-up, exposing it, challenging this in a court of law?

How long till Boston Dynamics releases the robot dogs to hunt you down and vax you?

Show older
Mastodon

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!