@thatfightnerd @arzachel The first "expert" named has degrees from University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign and University of Chicago, the second from Princeton University and Imperial College London, the third from Stanford University and the last one from Umeå University and Cornell University. Just going from the Video descriptions.
I don't know, but to me those don't appear like degree mills? I mean if those are degree mills *what isn't*?

@servant_of_the_anime_avatars @arzachel

In what?

@thatfightnerd @arzachel Look it up yourself, I am not here to do your basic fact checking.
I mean, I do not particularly care about what "experts" think, in general and even about "credentialism".

I was just curious whether YouTube had banned some shizo retards making shit up, or actual certified """experts""".

@servant_of_the_anime_avatars @arzachel You'd be surprised how little distinction there is between the two. Look at Dr. Seneff, who is a doctor in computer science who abuses her title to claim medical expertise.

@thatfightnerd @arzachel All claims have to be evaluated on their own merit.
"You are wrong because you studied the wrong thing", is not an argument.

@servant_of_the_anime_avatars @arzachel

It is if you claim to do population modelling and then people who actually do population modelling come out and write letters of objection pointing out that you're not engaging in proper stochastic modelling and that your parameters are overfitted.

Cry harder.

@thatfightnerd @arzachel >pointing out that you're not engaging in proper stochastic modelling and that your parameters are overfitted.
That is LITERALLY evaluating the claim on the merits.
I have no clue what you are trying to show here, since your example just confirms my argument.

>Cry harder.
Stop assuming that the second you see something you disagree with, the people involved are all clueless scam artists instead of medical professionals.